Gerard Goggin







Democratic affordances: Politics, media, and digital technology after WikiLeaks

This paper considers the role of digital technologies and cultures in re-envisioning democratic media and ethics. Much hope is being invested in the potential of digital technologies to provide the way forward to addressing the impasse in democratic communication, especially through innovative online news and journalism tools and projects. In the context of such discourses and initiatives, this paper argues that we need to develop a serviceable notion of 'democratic affordances', the qualities of digital technologies, and the media ecologies in which they take shape, that allow individuals and collectivities to pursue democracy, ethics, and justice. I explore this idea via an analysis of the celebrated case of Julian Assange's WikiLeaks, perhaps the most singular and spectacular example of innovation in democratic affordances. For its instigators, the potential of WikiLeaks at its birth appeared revolutionary and straightforward. As it has turned out, however, the interactions between journalism, news, and the digital in this novel platform have not been straightforward at all. The case of WikiLeaks thus reveals the need to take a much broader view of the pluralistic system in which such digital technologies now unfold. In particular, the paper argues for a comprehensive, pluralistic approach to designing the communicative architecture for ethical and truth-telling practices that go hand-in-hand with the struggle for democracy, justice and the good life.

Keywords: democracy, digital technology, democratic communication, affordances, WikiLeaks


References

  1. Allan, Stuart (2013) Journalism as interpretive performance: The case of WikiLeaks, in Rethinking journalism: Trust and participation in a transformed news landscape, Peters, Chris and Broersma (eds) London and New York, Routledge pp 144-159
  2. Amoore, Louise and de Goede, Marike (2005) Governance, risk and dataveillance in the war on terror, Crime, Law & Social Change, Vol. 43 pp 149-173
  3. Assange, Julian (2012a) Statement by Julian Assange after six months in Ecuadorian Embassy. Available online at http://wikileaks.org/Statement-by-Julian-Assange-after.html, accessed on 21 April 2013
  4. Assange, Julian (2012b) WikiLeaks cables paint chequered picture of Ecuador, Guardian, 19 June. Available online at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/19/wikileaks-cables-ecuador-julian-assange, accessed on 21 April 2013
  5. Beaumont, Peter and Sherwood, Harriet (2011) Egypt protesters defy tanks and teargas to make the streets their own, Guardian, 28 November. Available online at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/28/egypt-protests-latest-cairo-curfew, accessed 21 April 2013
  6. Brown, John Seely and Duguid, Paul (2000) The social life of information, Boston: Harvard Business School Press
  7. Brevini, Benedetta, Hintz, Arne and McCurdy, Patrick (eds) (2013) Beyond WikiLeaks: Implications for the future of communications, journalism and society, London, Palgrave
  8. Carter, Chelsea J. (2012) Assange disregards questions on free press, his reported ill health, CNN, 29 November. Available online at http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/29/world/europe/uk-assange-interview, accessed on 25 April 2013
  9. Castells, Manuel (2012) Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age, Cambridge, Polity
  10. Chadwick, Andrew and Howard, Philip N. (eds) (2008) Routledge handbook of internet politics, New York, Routledge
  11. Clarke, Roger (1994) Dataveillance by governments: The technique of computer matching, Information Technology & People, Vol. 7 pp 46-85
  12. Curran, James (2011) Media and democracy, Oxford and New York, Routledge
  13. Dahlberg, Lincoln and Siapera, Eugenia (eds) (2007) Radical democracy and the Internet: Interrogating theory and practice, Basingstoke, UK, Palgrave Macmillan
  14. Domscheit-Berg, Daniel (2011) Inside WikiLeaks: My time with Julian Assange at the world's most dangerous website, New York, Crown
  15. Fenton, Natalie (ed.) 2010) New media, old news: Journalism and democracy in the digital age, Los Angeles, Sage
  16. Garton Ash, Timothy (2009) Twitter counts more than armouries in this new politics of people power, Guardian, 17 June. Available online at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jun/17/iran-election-protests-twitter-students, accessed on 25 April 2013
  17. Ghonim, Wael (2012) Revolution 2.0: The power of the power is greater than the people in power, New York, Houghton Miffin Harcourt
  18. Gibson, James J. (1977) The theory of affordances, Shaw, Robert and Bransford, John (eds) Acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum pp 67-82
  19. Goggin, Gerard (2006) Cell phone culture: Mobile technology in everyday life, London and New York, Routledge
  20. Guardian (2010) Afghanistan war logs: How the Guardian got the story. Guardian, 25 July. Available online at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/25/afghanistan-war-logs-explained-video, accessed on 25 April 2013
  21. Hindman, Matthew (2009) The myth of digital democracy, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
  22. Huffington Post (2009) 9/11 text messages released: WikiLeaks publishes intercepted government pager texts as they were sent, Huffington Post, 25 November. Available online at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/25/911-text-messages-release_n_370085.html, accessed on 2 May 2013
  23. Index on Censorship (2008) Winners of Index on Censorship Freedom of Expression Awards announced. Available online at http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/04/winners-of-index-on-censorship-freedom-of-expression-award-announced/, accessed on 25 April 2013
  24. Joerges, Bernward (1999) Do politics have artefacts? Social Studies of Science, Vol. 29 pp 411-431
  25. Keane, John (2009) The life and death of democracy, London and New York, Simon and Schuster
  26. Keane, John (2013a) Does truth really matter in politics?, The Conversation, 10 April. Available online at http://theconversation.com/does-truth-really-matter-in-politics-7866, accessed on 26 April 2013
  27. Keane, John (2013b) Lunch and dinner with Julian Assange in prison, The Conversation, 18 February. Available online at http://theconversation.com/lunch-and-dinner-with-julian-assange-in-prison-12234, accessed on 26 April 2013
  28. Kennedy, Dan (2010) Why WikiLeaks turned to the press, Guardian, 27 July 2010. Available online at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/jul/27/why-wikileaks-turned-to-press, accessed on 25 April 2013
  29. Kies, RaphaŽl (2010) Promises and limits of web-deliberation, London, Palgrave Macmillan
  30. Latour, Bruno (2005) Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory, Oxford, Clarendon
  31. Latour, Bruno and Weibel, Peter (eds) (2005) Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
  32. Leigh, David and Harding, Luke (2011) WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange's war on secrecy, London, Guardian Books
  33. Lovink, Geert (2011) Networks without a cause: A critique of social media, Cambridge, Polity
  34. Papacharissi, Zizi (2010) A private sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age, Cambridge, Polity
  35. Politifact (2013) About Politifact. Available: http://www.politifact.com/about/, accessed on 25 April 2013
  36. Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1975) Capitalism, socialism, democracy, New York, Harper
  37. Shenker, Jack (2011) Egyptian protesters are not just Facebook revolutionaries, Guardian, 28 January. Available online at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/28/egyptian-protesters-facebook-revolutionaries, accessed on 25 April 2013
  38. Siddique, Haroon (2010) Press freedom group joins condemnation of WikiLeaks' war logs, Guardian, 13 August. Available online at http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/aug/13/wikileaks-reporters-without-borders, accessed on 25 April 2013
  39. Sreberny, Annabelle and Khiabany, Gholam (2010) Blogistan: The internet and politics in Iran, London, I. B. Tauris
  40. Sykes, Helen (ed.) (2012) More or less: Democracy and new media, Sydney, Future Leaders
  41. Visser, Gerrit (2009) WikiLeaks opens leaked documents. Available online at http://www.smartmobs.com/2009/11/26/wikileaks-opens-leaked-documents/, accessed on 25 April 2013
  42. WikiLeaks (2009) 9/11 tragedy pager intercepts. Available online at http://911.wikileaks.org/, accessed on 21 April 2013
  43. WikiLeaks (2010a) Afghan war diary. Available online at http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Afghan_War_Diary,_2004-2010, accessed on 21 April 2013
  44. WikiLeaks (2010b) Secret US embassy cables. Available online at http://wikileaks.org/cablegate.html, accessed on 21 April 2014
  45. Wikileaks (2013a) About us. Available at http://wikileaks.org/About.html, accessed on 21 April 2013
  46. Wikileaks (2013b) Submissions. Available at http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/WikiLeaks:Submissions, accessed on 21 April 2013
  47. Winner, Langdon (1980) Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, Vol. 109 pp 121-136
  48. Woolgar, Steve and Cooper, Geoff (1999) Do artefacts have ambivalence? Moses' bridges, winner's bridges and other urban legends in S and TS, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 29 pp 433-449
  49. Zhao, Yuezhi and Hackett, Robert A. (2005) Media globalization, media democratization: Challenges, issues and paradoxes, Hackett, Robert A. and Zhao, Yuezhi (eds) Democratizing global media: One world, many struggles, Lanham, MD, Rowman and Littlefield pp 1-33

Note on the contributor

Gerard Goggin is Professor and Chair of the Department of Media and Communications, the University of Sydney. He is published widely on the social, cultural, and political implications of new media, with books including Cell phone culture (2006), Internationalizing internet studies (2009), Global mobile media (2011) and Mobile technology and place (2012).